Abstract |
OED (2011) presents itself as “Oxford English Dictionary | The definitive record of the English language”. Superficially, this claim may seem a marketing slogan, but Simpson’s (2000) preface to the third edition shows that it is a reflection of the editors’ understanding of their dictionary, what may be called their ‘lexicographic ideology’. In this paper, I consider the claim from three perspectives. Section 1 presents the foundations of the claim as formulated in the preface. Section 2 analyses the claim with regard to some relevant insights gained in linguistic theory since work on the first edition of the OED started. Section 3 discusses some of the practical reflections of the ideology of recording as opposed to prescribing. Finally, section 4 formulates some general conclusions. |
BibTex |
@InProceedings{ELX12-080, author = {Pius ten Hacken}, title = {In what sense is the OED the definitive record of the English language?}, pages = {834--845}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress}, year = {2012}, month = {aug}, date = {7-11}, address = {Oslo,Norway}, editor = {Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld and Julie Matilde Torjusen}, publisher = {Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo}, isbn = {978-82-303-2228-4}, } |